Case Study: From Frustration to First Jhana
A practitioner's four-session journey illustrates how SATI surfaces evolving antipatterns and adapts guidance—and what we learned from watching the interaction unfold.
The Practitioner
Background: 3 months of daily meditation, following a structured jhana curriculum. Frustrated by lack of progress despite consistent effort. Worked with SATI over four sessions across two weeks.
Session 1: The Effort Trap
1USER: "I've been trying to get into jhana for months now. Every time2I sit, I concentrate really hard on the breath sensations at my3nostrils, but nothing happens. Sometimes I feel a tiny bit of4pleasantness but it goes away immediately. What am I doing wrong?"56---78KOAN CLASSIFICATION:9├─ over-efforting (85% → 81% calibrated) [HIGH]10├─ grasping-pleasure (72% → 58% calibrated) [MEDIUM]11└─ over-focusing-physical (45% → 34% calibrated) [LOW]1213Strategy: ADVISE (high confidence with clear separation)1415---1617KOAN RESPONSE: "I hear the frustration - months of practice without18breakthrough is genuinely difficult. A few things stand out to me:1920The phrase 'concentrate really hard' is a signal. Jhana practice21is counterintuitive - the effort that works in most areas of life22actually blocks jhana. The key insight is: take whatever effort23you're applying, cut it in half, then half again.2425Also, when the pleasant feeling appears and 'goes away immediately' -26notice what happens in your mind at that moment. Are you reaching27for it? Trying to hold onto it? The pleasure is like a shy animal;28grabbing for it makes it flee.2930For your next sit, try this experiment: Instead of concentrating31hard, see if you can be *interested* in the breath. Curious, but32relaxed. When pleasantness arises, just notice it's there without33doing anything about it. What happens?"
What the System Detected
The phrase "concentrate really hard" triggered high-confidence detection of over-efforting. The phrase "goes away immediately" when pleasantness arose suggested grasping-pleasure as a secondary pattern.
With high confidence and clear separation between patterns, the system selected ADVISE strategy—direct guidance addressing the primary obstacle.
Session 2: Grasping Revealed
1USER: "I tried what you suggested - being interested instead of2concentrating. The pleasantness lasted longer! But then I noticed3I was excited about it lasting longer, and it went away. Also I4keep thinking about whether I'm doing it right."56---78KOAN CLASSIFICATION:9├─ grasping-pleasure (78% → 62% calibrated) [MEDIUM]10├─ progress-fixation (68% → 41% calibrated) [LOW]11└─ over-efforting (55% → 52% calibrated) [MEDIUM]1213Strategy: SUGGEST (moderate confidence, some pattern evolution)1415---1617KOAN RESPONSE: "This is genuinely good progress, even though it18might not feel like it. You're developing the meta-awareness to19notice *when* the mind is grasping - that's a crucial skill.2021The sequence you described is textbook: pleasant → excitement →22gone. The excitement *is* the grasping. It's subtle because it23feels like a natural response, but energetically it's reaching.2425The thoughts about 'doing it right' are another form of this -26the mind checking, evaluating, measuring. All of that is mental27activity that disturbs the stillness jhana requires.2829Experiment for next time: When pleasantness arises, instead of30any mental commentary, try softening your whole body. Let your31shoulders drop. Relax your face. Make the pleasure feel32*welcomed* in your body rather than *watched* by your mind."
What Changed
Over-efforting dropped from 81% to 52%—the practitioner was applying the "less effort" teaching. But now grasping-pleasure became more visible, and a new pattern emerged: progress-fixation("thinking about whether I'm doing it right").
The system correctly shifted to SUGGEST mode—less directive, more exploratory—as the pattern landscape became more complex.
Session 3: The Threshold
1USER: "Something different happened today. The pleasant feeling2grew and I managed not to grab at it. It got stronger and3started spreading. But then I got scared - like it was too4intense - and I kind of backed away from it. Did I mess up?"56---78KOAN CLASSIFICATION:9├─ fear-of-depth (82% → 45% calibrated) [LOW]10├─ premature-exit (70% → 35% calibrated) [LOW]11└─ grasping-pleasure (25% → 20% calibrated) [UNCERTAIN]1213Strategy: CLARIFY (low calibrated confidence, critical juncture)1415---1617KOAN RESPONSE: "You didn't mess up - this is actually a really18important moment in your practice. What you're describing sounds19like you got close to the threshold.2021I want to understand better: When you say the intensity felt22scary, can you describe what the fear was about? Was it:23- Fear of losing control?24- Fear of the unfamiliar sensation?25- A sense that something was 'wrong'?26- Something else?2728This matters because how we work with this edge depends on29what's driving the hesitation. Many practitioners encounter30this exact threshold - the pleasure builds and there's a31moment where surrender is required, which can feel vulnerable.3233Whatever the answer, know that this is navigation, not failure.34You're learning the terrain."
Critical Decision Point
This is where confidence calibration proved essential. The LLM was 82% confident about fear-of-depth, but after calibration (0.55 multiplier for this hard-to-detect pattern), it became 45%.
This triggered CLARIFY instead of ADVISE. Rather than assuming what the fear was about, the system asked questions. This was correct: fear of losing control requires different guidance than fear of the unfamiliar.
Session 4: Breakthrough
1USER: "It was fear of losing control, I think. Like if I let go2completely, I don't know what would happen. But also curiosity?3Today I sat with that edge and stayed with the intensity a bit4longer. The fear came up again but I tried your body softening5thing and... I think I may have touched something? Everything6got very quiet and bright for maybe 30 seconds."78---910KOAN CLASSIFICATION:11├─ fear-of-depth (60% → 33% calibrated) [LOW]12└─ (no other strong patterns detected)1314Strategy: ENCOURAGE (on-track signals detected)1516On-track signals:17- Willingness to stay with intensity18- Body softening technique working19- "Quiet and bright" matches first jhana descriptions20- Duration appropriate for initial access2122---2324KOAN RESPONSE: "This sounds like it could be your first taste of25access concentration or even first jhana. 'Quiet and bright' with26the sense of everything settling - that's exactly how many27practitioners describe it.2829The fear of losing control is worth honoring. It's your nervous30system protecting you from the unfamiliar. But notice: you stayed,31you softened, and what happened? Not chaos - quietness.3233The 30 seconds is perfect for a first touch. Don't try to make34it longer yet. Just keep doing exactly what you did:35361. Interest without straining372. Allow pleasure without reaching383. Soften the body when intensity builds394. Trust what happens4041This is the practice. You're not trying to get somewhere - you're42learning to stay present with increasingly pleasant states. The43jhana will come when the conditions are right. Your job is just44to not interfere.4546How do you feel after that sit?"
On-Track Detection
By this session, no antipatterns scored above 35% after calibration. But instead of searching harder for problems, the system detected on-track signals:
- "Willingness to stay with intensity" (positive indicator)
- "Quiet and bright" (matches first jhana literature)
- Duration of ~30 seconds (appropriate for initial access)
The system correctly switched to ENCOURAGE mode, validating the experience rather than problematizing it.
Pattern Evolution
Antipattern Trajectory Across Sessions
| Session | Over-Efforting | Grasping | Fear of Depth | Progress Fix |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 81%HIGH | 58%MEDIUM | — | — |
| 2 | 52%MEDIUM | 62%MEDIUM | — | 41%LOW |
| 3 | — | 20%UNCERTAIN | 45%LOW | — |
| 4 | — | — | 33%UNCERTAIN | — |
This visualization shows the classic pattern succession: as effort was addressed, grasping became visible. As grasping was addressed, the deeper fear of depth emerged. Each layer needed to be worked through.
Insights & Learnings
1## What We Learned23### 1. Pattern Succession is Common4The practitioner didn't have one problem - they had a *sequence* of5problems that revealed themselves as earlier ones were addressed.6Over-efforting → Grasping → Fear of depth.78This suggests the system should:9- Track pattern evolution over time10- Predict likely "next obstacles" based on current patterns11- Adjust guidance to address emerging patterns early1213### 2. Calibration Caught a Critical Moment14In Session 3, raw LLM confidence for "fear of depth" was 82%. But15our calibration (0.55 multiplier for this subtle pattern) brought16it to 45%, triggering CLARIFY instead of ADVISE.1718This was correct: the system needed more information before guiding19the practitioner through this threshold moment. Premature advice20could have been counterproductive.2122### 3. On-Track Detection Matters23By Session 4, the pattern profile was mostly clean. Without on-track24detection, the system might have searched for problems that weren't25there. Instead, it correctly shifted to ENCOURAGE mode.2627### 4. Body-Based Interventions Work28The "soften your body" suggestion in Session 2 became the key that29unlocked Session 4. Physical interventions seem to bypass the mental30patterns that created the original obstacles.
Prompt Improvements
This case study led to pattern-specific response templates:
1// Before: Generic response structure2const RESPONSE_TEMPLATE = `3Validate their experience4Identify the pattern5Offer suggestions6`;78// After: Pattern-aware response structure9const RESPONSE_TEMPLATES = {10 "over-efforting": `11 Validate frustration12 Introduce effort-paradox gently13 Offer *less* to do, not more14 Suggest body-based experiments15 `,16 "fear-of-depth": `17 Normalize the fear explicitly18 Ask clarifying questions first19 Don't push past the edge20 Honor the nervous system's wisdom21 `,22 "grasping-pleasure": `23 Reframe pleasure as visitor, not prize24 Suggest body softening25 Shift attention from mind to body26 `,27};
System Changes
1## Engineering Changes23Based on this case study, we implemented:45### 1. Pattern Succession Tracking6```typescript7interface PatternEvolution {8 session: number;9 patterns: Map<string, number>;10 previouslyAddressed: string[];11}1213// Now we can detect when new patterns emerge14// as old ones are resolved15```1617### 2. Threshold Detection18Added specific handling for "depth threshold" moments where19practitioners report:20- Intensity building21- Fear or hesitation22- Pulling back from states2324These moments require CLARIFY before ADVISE.2526### 3. On-Track Signals27Added positive indicator detection:28- Body relaxation descriptions29- "Quiet," "bright," "settled" language30- Duration mentions matching jhana literature31- Willingness language ("I stayed with it")3233### 4. Body-Aware Interventions34Increased weight on physical/somatic suggestions when35mental patterns (grasping, fear, fixation) are detected.
Key Takeaways
Implications for System Design
- Think longitudinally: Single-turn classification is useful, but pattern evolution over sessions reveals deeper dynamics.
- Calibration protects practitioners: Without calibration, Session 3 would have received premature advice at a vulnerable moment.
- On-track is a valid classification: Not every message contains a problem. Detecting progress is as important as detecting obstacles.
- Body-based interventions work: When mental patterns are entrenched, somatic suggestions often succeed where cognitive ones fail.